The difference between a technically solid photograph and a real winner that makes clients stop for a closer look is a matter of style
![]() Figure 1 |
On the topic of aesthetics with creativity and style, I’d like to focus on filters, more specifically, digital filters. If your experience with photography predates digital, you’ve probably used any number of filters, such as UV, polarizer, graduated neutral-density, neutral-density, close-up, infrared, color balance, color-correction, special-effects, skylight, haze and maybe more. The approach of using such filters always has been rather easy, but there has been a fundamental weakness—that is, the effects being embedded into your film’s exposure were virtually irreversible.
![]() Figure 2 |
![]() Figure 3 |
![]() Figure 4 |
When I make a picture, I think about achieving the best original file and about how I’ll use the image, and sometimes, the original shot isn’t the best (maybe more often than I’ll acknowledge). I don’t discard it; I keep it and take the opportunity to examine it using software, where I frequently find parts of the image that can be turned into a winner through cropping and prudent creative use of the software’s special tools—filters.
In “Think Different About RAW” (Digital Photo Pro, Sept./Oct. 2008), I spoke to the topic of the power of using multiple file types and editing/filtering tools from several software programs on a single image file. In this article, I’ll use three software features and three file types (JPEG, TIFF and RAW NEF files), all combined and enabling creation of a single image presentation with my personal style.


Read More...